<div dir="ltr">Dear D<span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap">ario</span><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;font-weight:bold;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap">Thank you very much </span><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap"> for your support.It works well and some of the jobs have been finished successfully. </span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap">But one thing in my mind. In my whole calculations , I used PBE with ultrasoft pseudopotentials. But to do "scf" calculations with  PBE0 "hybrid"</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(84,84,84);line-height:18.2px">functional</span><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap"> I have to use "Norm conserving pseudopotential". So how can I compare these two results.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap">Please suggest any idea..... </span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px;white-space:nowrap">Thank you again </span></div><div><br></div><div><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">Narendra Nath Ghosh</span></b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"></span></p><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">Research Associate</span></b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"></span></p><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">University of Gour Banga</span></b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"></span></p><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">Department of Computational Physics </span></b></p><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">Malda-732102</span></b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif"></span></p><p style="font-size:12.8px;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-image:initial;background-repeat:initial"><b><span style="font-family:"times new roman",serif">India</span></b></p></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:17 AM, dario rocca <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roccad@gmail.com" target="_blank">roccad@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Dear Narendranath,<br>Your calculation has reached convergence if you read the message "EXX self-consistency reached".<br>You can learn some details about the scf procedure with hybrid functionals in PW/examples/EXX_example.<br></div>PBE0 and hybrid functional calculations are in general very expensive. I would suggest you run an example to see what to expect. <br>You might also try to perform a calculation on your system with minimal computational parameters (very small cut-off, few/one k-points) just to see that your run can indeed terminate smoothly. Then I would look for a set of parameters which are a good compromise between computational time and the accuracy you need.<br></div><div>You might also try to modify the parameter ecutfock to gain some speed.<a name="m_8628047342745354822_m_5589048684071497418_idm6425904"></a><a name="m_8628047342745354822_m_5589048684071497418_ecutfock"></a></div><div>For sure a hybrid functional calculation on a CNT+Fullerene system might be rather challenging.<br></div><div>Best,<br></div><div>Dario  <br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Narendranath Ghosh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ghosh.naren13@gmail.com" target="_blank">ghosh.naren13@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear all</div><div><br></div>                   After optimizing a system "CNT+Fullerene" with "PBE" I am trying to calculate "scf" calculation with "PBE0" hybrid functional using  NC Pseudopotential.<div><br></div><div>In output file I found "<b>convergence has been achieved in  15 iterations" </b>But the job was not finished even after more than one week. I could not find any mistake in my input. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Please suggest any idea.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><h3 style="font-size:18px;font-weight:normal;margin:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-left:0px;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;white-space:nowrap"><br></h3> </div></div>
<br></div></div>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Pw_forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" target="_blank">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pwscf.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/pw_forum</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Pw_forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" target="_blank">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pwscf.org/mailman/listi<wbr>nfo/pw_forum</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>