<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/08/2013 08:31 AM, Suresh A wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAE_UR+UhfeshKaNkth8ij=teg7AeZX-=z0T632godw=2Uxj9HA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>Dear Everybody,<br>
                </div>
                                        Thank You for your reply.<br>
              </div>
              Dear Sava,<br>
            </div>
                            In your reply you have quoted that " you
            need not worry about symmetry conservation" is that means
            did i use any symmetry conservation like card in my input
            file?<br>
            <br>
            <br>
          </div>
          Dear Giuseppe,<br>
        </div>
                              First i did vc-relax with ecutwfc=50 and
        ecutrho=200. for that input file that input file iget output as
        follows.<br>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>        entering subroutine stress ...<br>
              <br>
                        total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                  
              (kbar)     P=   -0.08<br>
                -0.00000057  -0.00000025   0.00000000         -0.08    
              -0.04      0.00<br>
                -0.00000025  -0.00000057   0.00000000         -0.04    
              -0.08      0.00<br>
                 0.00000000   0.00000000  -0.00000047          0.00     
              0.00     -0.07<br>
              <br>
              <br>
                   bfgs converged in   7 scf cycles and   5 bfgs steps<br>
                   (criteria: energy < 0.10E-04, force < 0.10E-03,
              cell < 0.20E+01)<br>
              <br>
                   End of BFGS Geometry Optimization<br>
              <br>
                   Final enthalpy =    -142.8393726978 Ry<br>
              Begin final coordinates<br>
                   new unit-cell volume =    365.14428 a.u.^3 (   
              54.10880 Ang^3 )<br>
              <br>
              CELL_PARAMETERS (alat=  8.68089163)<br>
                 0.951086548   0.000003754   0.000000000<br>
                 0.000003754   0.951086548   0.000000000<br>
                 0.000000000   0.000000000   0.617065718<br>
              <br>
              <br>
                       entering subroutine stress ...<br>
              <br>
                        total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                  
              (kbar)     P= -233.71<br>
                -0.00161914  -0.00000028   0.00000000       -238.18    
              -0.04      0.00<br>
                -0.00000028  -0.00161914   0.00000000         -0.04  
              -238.18      0.00<br>
                 0.00000000   0.00000000  -0.00152791          0.00     
              0.00   -224.76<br>
              <br>
              <br>
                   Writing output data file pwscf.save<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>there was a very large difference between last
              converged structures kbar values so i suddenly change
              energy cuttoffs values to 200/800. Futhermore i create
              this inputfile with the help of pwgui. Pwgui automatically
              inserted exxdiv_treatment card which i didn't notice in my
              calculation. I got some clues on my calculation. I will
              reply soon to your answer.<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>Dear Emine, <br>
            </div>
            <div>                 I took pseudopotential as it is from
              quantum espresso website. i didn't check on it whether it
              is hard pseudopotential or soft one. the i choose higher
              cutoff because to reduce kbar difference as i shown above.
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>After i check my calculation i will reply to you.<br>
            </div>
            <div>                         Thank you  all once again<br
                clear="all">
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div>
                          <div>
                            <div>
                              <div
                                style="margin-left:40px;text-align:right">
                                                  With Regards,<br>
                              </div>
                              <div style="text-align:right">A.Suresh,<br>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                            <div style="text-align:right">Project
                              Fellow,<br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <div style="text-align:right">Madurai Kamaraj
                            University,<br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                        <div style="text-align:right">Madurai.<br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAE_UR+UhfeshKaNkth8ij=teg7AeZX-=z0T632godw=2Uxj9HA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum">http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
      Symmetry with orthogonal  axes is automatically conserved <br>
      (primitive-cell) in vc-relax. Additionaly  "cell-factor" variable
    should also <br>
      take your attention. Take its value more than its defaut  <br>
      (such as between 1.5-2.0). According to the output tiO2 <br>
      cell did not contract so much, but you can test whether or not the
    <br>
      expansion of reciprocal space is enough to reinterpolate (fairly)
    the tables.  <br>
    <br>
      Note : In your output it seems that symmetry (tetragonal) is
    breaked (slightly). <br>
                 I don't know why it's occured but make sure that all
    pseudopotential <br>
                 and cutoff related issues solved before attempt to
    solve symmetry <br>
                 related ones.<br>
    <br>
       Savaş AĞDUK<br>
       Research Assistant<br>
       Karabuk University<br>
       Physics Department<br>
    <br>
      <br>
  </body>
</html>