<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Dear Sir, I mean that can we create  norm-conserving pp using ld1.x?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
<font color="#3366ff">
> Dear Dr. Axel,<br>
><br>
>    You said ld1.x cannot generate van-style ultrasoft pseudopotential, but<br>
> can ld1.x generate van-style norm-conserving pseudopotential? I think ld1.x<br>
> can't make it.<br>
<br>
</font></div><font color="#3366ff">i don't understand what you are asking here.<br>
<br>
there is a difference between multi-projector<br>
norm-conserving pseudopotentials and<br>
vanderbilt style ultra-soft potentials. that<br>
being said, there is nothing inherently<br>
bad about rrkj ultrasofts.<br></font>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
axel.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote></div>