When O is perturbed in the case of NiO in tutorial, it is re-positioned and there are 2 different kinds of O (first with 1 atom, the second with 7 atoms). Then the kind with only one O is perturbed. In the tutorial, it reads "This is done to preserve the largest possible number of symmetries". Is this process necessary? Can we just run computation without re-position? In that case, there is only one kind of O with 8 atoms.<div>
<br></div><div>In the position file "filepos", the scale of cell length is always 10, even if the scale is 7.9 in NiO and 5.42 in Fe. Shall we always use 10 in position file no matter what the real scale is?<br>
<div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Burak Himmetoglu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:himm0013@umn.edu" target="_blank">himm0013@umn.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Peng,<div><br></div><div>r.x assigns the values of the response matrices only by considering the distance between atoms and whether they have the same spin and type or not. This information has to be given by the user in the positions file "filepos" read by &input_mat. If B(1) and B(2) are different types (e.g. crystallographically) you should perturb them separately, as you outlined in the procedure, and make sure that ntyp=3 (type 1 is B(1), type 2 is B(2) and type 3 is O) in the namelist &input_mat that goes into r.x</div>
<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Burak <div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Stefano de Gironcoli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:degironc@sissa.it" target="_blank">degironc@sissa.it</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>I don't know the details of r.x code
but I think that, physically, what matters is the two atoms are
crystallographically equivalent or not .therefore I think space
group symmetry is the relevant one.<br>
<br>
stefano<div><div><br>
<br>
On 07/10/2012 05:54 AM, Peng Chen wrote:<br>
</div></div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div><div>
<pre>Dear All,
In the calculation of U, how can we determine the equivalence of the ions,
by site symmetry or space group symmetry?
E.g ABO3, B ions has 2 different site symmetries (B(1) B(2)). Shall we run
calculation on perturbing B(1) and B(2) ions or just a B ion?
In order to find U in B ions, I tried to run calculation with perturbing
just on B, and r.x gave some errors that it needs to read more data.
So I guess it needs the perturbed data from other atoms. Shall I use the
procedures listed below?
1. run scf calculation with Hubbard_U(i)= 1.d-20
2. run scf with perturbing on an A ion
3. run scf with perturbing on a B(1) ion
4. run scf with perturbing on a B(2) ion
5. run scf with perturbing on an O ion
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><pre>_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" target="_blank">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a>
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pw_forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" target="_blank">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Pw_forum mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" target="_blank">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br> Best Regards.<br> Peng <br>
</div></div>
</div>