<HTML>
<font style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt;"><div><br/> </div></font>
<div>--------------------------------------------------<br />
Mahmoud Payami<br />
Physics Group, AEOI, Tehran-Iran<br />
E-mail : mpayami@aeoi.org.ir<br />
--------------------------------------------------</div>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz@democritos.it><BR>
To: mpayami@aeoi.org.ir<BR>
Cc: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum@pwscf.org><BR>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:02:19 +0100<BR>
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] R&G space division vs K-point division<BR>
<BR>
<div style="font-family: monospace, courier new, courier">
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0330, Mahmoud Payami wrote:<br />
<br />
<br />
> Is it possible to decouple R & G space division from the K-point<br />
> division such that they can be asigned arbitrary values?<br />
<br />
not sure what you mean. The parallelization over k-points<br />
and over R- and G- space are "decoupled", i.e. you can<br />
choose independently how many processors for the latter<br />
and how many for the former. There are separate restrictions <br />
on both, though. Unless of course you have other restrictions <br />
on the total number of processors you can run on (e.g.only <br />
powers of 2, as in some machines).<br />
<br />
P.<br />
<br />
-- <br />
Paolo Giannozzi, IOM-Democritos and University of Udine, Italy<br />
<br />
<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
Pw_forum mailing list<br />
Pw_forum@pwscf.org<br />
<a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a><br />
</div>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>