<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz@democritos.it><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> PWSCF Forum <pw_forum@pwscf.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Mon, April 18, 2011 6:36:42 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Pw_forum] Pseudo potentials for hybrid DFT<br></font><br>
<br>On Apr 18, 2011, at 18:25 , Eyvaz Isaev wrote:<br><br>> Variable: input_dft<br>> [...]<br>> But as far as I remember this works (at least, worked) for norm- <br>> conserving pseudopotentials only.<br><br>>just a remark: hybrid functionals work only for norm-conserving <br>> pseudopotentials, but variable input_dft works in all cases<br><br>Paolo, thanks for the correction. Of course, I meant hybrid functionals. <br><br>Bests, <br>Eyvaz.<br><br><br></div></div>
</div></body></html>