<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Hi Lorenzo,<br>I ran the regeneration using the 0.00 energies and the error didn't occurs as expected. But I got one warning about the reference state:<br>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WARNING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> Message from routine ld1_readin:<br> US requires at least two energies per channel 2P<br> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> --------------------------- All-electron run ----------------------------<br><br>Please, I would like you to help with the section concerning the 1 1S, 2 2S and 2 2P reference states. I mean, what should I put in the following section?<br><br>/<br>3<br>1S 1 0 2.00 0.00 0.75000000000 1.10000000000 <br>2S 2 0 0.80
0.00 0.75000000000 1.10000000000<br>2P 2 1 0.20 0.00 0.75000000000 1.10000000000<br><br>Thanks one again for your help<br><br>**********************************<br>Bertrand SITAMTZE<br>PhD student<br>Department of physics<br>University of Yaoundé I-Cameroon<br>**********************************<br><br>--- En date de : <b>Mar 1..9.09, Lorenzo Paulatto <i><paulatto@sissa.it></i></b> a écrit :<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>De: Lorenzo Paulatto <paulatto@sissa.it><br>Objet: Re: [Pw_forum] Re : Re:Pseudopotential for Li<br>À: "PWSCF Forum" <pw_forum@pwscf.org><br>Date: Mardi 1 Septembre 2009, 10h25<br><br><div class="plainMail">In data 01 settembre 2009 alle ore 10:18:36, Bertrand SITAMTZE <br><<a ymailto="mailto:siyouber@yahoo.fr"
href="/mc/compose?to=siyouber@yahoo.fr">siyouber@yahoo.fr</a>> ha scritto:<br>> 1S 1 0 2.00 -3.84792392914 0.75000000000 1.10000000000 2S <br>> 2 0 0.80 -0.22057651078 0.75000000000 1.10000000000 2P 2 <br>> 1 0.20 -0.08952793836 0.75000000000 1.10000000000<br><br>Dear Betrand,<br>if you want to use the eigenvalue energy for a reference orbital you don't <br>have to copy it from the all-electron calculation: just use 0.00 instead <br>and it will work.<br><br>Also note that doing an ultrasoft pseudopotential you'll need at least two <br>reference wavefunctions per value of l. In your specific case I would use <br>2 2s and 2 2p but only one 1s (it has
the same l as 2s).<br><br>best regards<br><br><br>-- <br>Lorenzo Paulatto<br>SISSA & DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)<br>phone: +39 040 3787 511<br>skype: paulatz<br>www: <a href="http://people.sissa.it/%7Epaulatto/" target="_blank">http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/</a><br><br> *** save italian brains ***<br> <a href="http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://saveitalianbrains.wordpress.com/</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Pw_forum mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org" href="/mc/compose?to=Pw_forum@pwscf.org">Pw_forum@pwscf.org</a><br><a href="http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum" target="_blank">http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>