[Pw_forum] BLYP

Paolo Giannozzi p.giannozzi at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 17:01:59 CET 2016


input_dft='blyp', not input_dft=blyp. The best choice would be to use
pseudopotentials caomputed for B3LYP, but since there aren't any (not that
I know), BLYP pseudopotentials is the second best choice.

Paolo

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:21 PM, ashkan shekaari <shekaari at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear experts,
>
> Is it sensible to use input_dft=b3lyp with blyp pseudopotentials?
> *--*
> *Regards,*
> *Ashkan Shekaari*
> *Plasma Physics Research Center*
> *Science and Research Branch*
> *I A U, 14778-93855 Tehran, Iran.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161128/df8c31e2/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list