[Pw_forum] definition of bare potential

Paolo Giannozzi p.giannozzi at gmail.com
Wed Jun 3 09:13:14 CEST 2015


For PP/Doc/INPUT_PW.* :
                   2  = local ionic potential V_bare
So V_bare = local part of the ionic pseudopotential

Paolo


On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:05 AM, pourya <pourya at flex.phys.tohoku.ac.jp>
wrote:

> Dear Quantum Espresso Users
>
> I have the same question as the previous uestion email
>
> I have a question regarding the definition of bare ionic potential,
> In the PP.x when we calculate the bare potential, is it just the
> contribution of columbic potential of positively charged ion centers ?
> or core electrons that are included in the  psudopotential also have
> contribution to it?
> What is exact definition of bare potential then?
>
> I will appreciate you if someone explains these questions.
>
> Best Regard,
>
> Pourya
>
> Tohoku University, Japan
>
> On 06/01/2015 05:19 AM, Meysam Pazoki wrote:
> > Dear Espresso Users,
> >
> > I have a question regarding the definition of bare ionic potential,
> > In the PP.x when we calculate the bare potential, is it just the
> contribution of columbic potential of positively charged ion centers ?
> > or core electrons that are included in the  psudopotential also have
> contribution to it?
> > What is exact definition of bare potential then?
> >
> > Thanks a lot in advance
> > My Best Regards
> > Meysam
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150603/51ae7f31/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list