[Pw_forum] pw.x seg. faults with EXX
naphtaly moro
moronaphtaly84 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 15:07:50 CEST 2011
Dear Omolou
It is because one sets the ecutrho to greater than for for ultrasoft PP, but
since EXX as implemented in QE uses normconserving pp it is not hence
necessary to increase the ecutrho to more than 4
Kind Regards
==============================================
OUMA, Cecil Naphtaly Moro
PhD. Student
Physics Department, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Office 5-61, NW-1 Building
Cell: +27 721385182
==============================================
"Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not
circles,
and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a straight line." -
Benoit Mandelbrot
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, <pw_forum-request at pwscf.org> wrote:
> Send Pw_forum mailing list submissions to
> pw_forum at pwscf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pw_forum-request at pwscf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pw_forum-owner at pwscf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pw_forum digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Error (gulzar ahmed)
> 2. problem in K_point selection. (Mahdi Faqieh nasiri)
> 3. problem in K_Point selection. (Mahdi Faqieh nasiri)
> 4. anyone meets the problem like this? (Robin H)
> 5. About abbrevations of thermo.f (zafar rasheed)
> 6. pw.x seg. faults with EXX (Omololu Akin-Ojo)
> 7. Re: pw.x seg. faults with EXX (Omololu Akin-Ojo)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:02:47 +0530
> From: gulzar ahmed <gulzarahmed61 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] Error
> To: Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Message-ID:
> <CAPc7koC1GHH-LbHq6L64Oz_jwJUkNhtBbUGQYCaR30HdNp7r6w at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I am getting error in Error: Function 'waveunit' at (1) has no IMPLICIT
> type
>
> --
> GUL AHMED
> (M) 99820-94533
> Save trees. Print Only When Necessary
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110804/ff558092/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mahdi Faqieh nasiri <mahdi_fn109 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] problem in K_point selection.
> To: "pw_forum at pwscf.org" <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID:
> <1312445904.30602.YahooMailNeo at web43145.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have an error in output file for scf calculation,?
>
>
> ? ? ? ? k( ? 24) = ( ?-0.4285714 ? 0.4123930 ? 0.0000000), wk = ? 0.0816327
> ? ? ? ? k( ? 25) = ( ?-0.4285714 ?-0.0824786 ? 0.0000000), wk = ? 0.0816327
>
> ? ? ?G cutoff = ? 83.6540 ?( ?23611 G-vectors) ? ? FFT grid: ( 20, 20,160)
> ? ? ?G cutoff = ? 57.9143 ?( ?13733 G-vectors) ?smooth grid: ( 15, 15,135)
> rank 3 in job 24 ?mzmr-desktop_51851 ? caused collective abort of all ranks
> ? exit status of rank 3: killed by signal 11?
>
>
> how can i fix this error?
> I think it appear from wrong ?k_point? and ?ecutwfc?.
> The following is a k_point and ecutwfc:
>
> ecutwfc =50 ,
> ecutrho = 300 ,
>
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 7 ?6 ?1 ? ? 0 ?0 ?0
>
> Can anyone help me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> ?
> Mahdi Faghih nasiri
> MSC,
> Guilan University,
> Rasht, Iran.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110804/d71283de/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mahdi Faqieh nasiri <mahdi_fn109 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] problem in K_Point selection.
> To: "pw_forum at pwscf.org" <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID:
> <1312445903.55358.YahooMailNeo at web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I have an error in output file for scf calculation,?
>
>
> ? ? ? ? ?k( ? 24) = ( ?-0.4285714 ? 0.4123930 ? 0.0000000), wk = ?
> 0.0816327
> ? ? ? ? ?k( ? 25) = ( ?-0.4285714 ?-0.0824786 ? 0.0000000), wk = ?
> 0.0816327
>
> ? ? ? ? ?G cutoff = ? 83.6540 ?( ?23611 G-vectors) ? ? FFT grid: ( 20,
> 20,160)
> ? ? ? ? ?G cutoff = ? 57.9143 ?( ?13733 G-vectors) ?smooth grid: ( 15,
> 15,135)
> ? ? ? ? ?rank 3 in job 24 ?mzmr-desktop_51851 ? caused collective abort of
> all ranks
> ? ? ? ? ?exit status of rank 3: killed by signal 11?
>
>
> how can i fix this error?
> I think it appear from wrong ?k_point? and ?ecutwfc?.
> The following is a k_point and ecutwfc:
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ecutwfc =50 ,
> ? ? ? ? ? ecutrho = 300 ,
>
> ? ? ? ? ? K_POINTS {automatic}
> ? ? ? ? ? 7 ?6 ?1 ? ? 0 ?0 ?0
>
> Can anyone help me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> ?
> Mahdi Faghih nasiri
> MSC,
> Guilan University,
> Rasht, Iran.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110804/fee82dec/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:30:12 +0800
> From: Robin H <robinshy at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] anyone meets the problem like this?
> To: Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Message-ID:
> <CALd2EASxekmbfzfZn-znapWWoQKDW+ey2k2W=f4XeFH=Sv78gA at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear all,anyone who used revPBE to creat PP has meet the warning like this
> :
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WARNING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Message from routine ld1_readin:
> US requires at least two energies per channel 4P
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I am anxious to know how to resolve it. Welcome any suggestion.
> my input is :
> &input
> title='Zn'
> zed=30.
> rel=1,
> config='[Ar] 3d10.00 4s1.00 4p1.00',
> iswitch=3,
> dft='revPBE'
> /
> &inputp
> lloc=1,
> pseudotype=3,
> tm=.true.,
> file_pseudopw='Zn.revPBE.UPF',
> /
> 5
> 3D 3 2 10.00 0.00 1.80 2.00
> 3D 3 2 0.00 0.05 1.80 2.00
> 4S 1 0 1.00 0.00 1.80 2.00
> 4S 1 0 0.00 0.05 1.80 2.00
> 4P 2 1 1.00 0.00 1.80 2.10
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110804/c87c88bd/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 02:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: zafar rasheed <zafartariq2003 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] About abbrevations of thermo.f
> To: forum forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID:
> <1312450743.95871.YahooMailNeo at web65416.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I am calculating thermal properties using example "example_EOS" (thermo
> program). I get out put but I can not understand the abbrevation "bs.d".
> Whereas some abbrevations (according to me)
> **vol.d ==> P vs. V at various temperatures
> **alpha.d ==> Thermal Exancivity Vs T
> **bt.d ==> Bulk modulus vs T at various pressures
> ** Cp.d ==> Cp vs T at various Pressures
> ** Cv.d ==> Cv vs T at various pressures
> ** ga.d ==> Thermal gruension Parameter
> ** stp.d ==> Entrop vs T at various pressures
> **AM I RIGHT **
> Also tell me what is 4th term in weight (input and input_QHA present in QHA
> directry of thermo program)
> ****input*******
> #v,#q,#freq,#unit
> 10,72,6,1
> P= -4.2000 V= 128.0000 E= -34.511049940
> 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
> 0.000000000
> 0.000000000
> 0.000000000
> 389.703600000
> 389.703600000
> 689.271300000
> -0.083333000 0.083333000 -0.083333000
> 65.161900000
> 65.161900000
> 111.638700000
> 388.319400000
> 388.319400000
> 685.533400000
> -0.166667000 0.166667000 -0.166667000
> 125.786900000
> 125.786900000
> 218.804400000
> 384.646500000
> 384.646500000
> 674.502500000
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> weight
> 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0011574 <=== how we can calculate it?
> -0.0833333 0.0833333 -0.0833333 0.0092593
> -0.1666667 0.1666667 -0.1666667 0.0092593
> -0.2500000 0.2500000 -0.2500000 0.0092593
> -0.3333333 0.3333333 -0.3333333 0.0092593
> -0.4166667 0.4166667 -0.4166667 0.0092593
> .......
> ......
> .....
> ?
>
> Muhammad Zafar
> PhD Scholar
> Department of Physics
> The Islamia University of Bahawalpur,PakistanBest Regards
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110804/979b330a/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:50:52 -0400
> From: Omololu Akin-Ojo <prayerz.omo at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Pw_forum] pw.x seg. faults with EXX
> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAEXTJ7RXsBvBZh-i-J=Drh_HsbKOv=i8a5Exp9qYhdZiEG6_Ag at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Ciao Tutti,
>
> I am trying to do a calculation with the PBE0 functional. I compiled
> pw.x using -DEXX. However, I got the following message when I tried to
> run. (If I replace input_dft='pbe0' with input_dft='pbe', I don't have
> this error but this is obviously not what I want.
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> XC functional enforced from input :
> Exchange-correlation = PBE0 (6484)
> EXX-fraction = 0.25
> !!! Any further DFT definition will be discarded
> !!! Please, verify this is what you really want !
>
> file O.pbe-mt.UPF: wavefunction(s) 0S 0P 0D renormalized
>
> Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue
> problem:
> a serial algorithm will be used
>
> [compute-1-7:09041] *** Process received signal ***
> [compute-1-7:09041] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> [compute-1-7:09041] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> [compute-1-7:09041] Failing at address: 0x5
>
>
> o.
>
> Postdoctoral Fellow,
> ICTP, Trieste, ITALY
>
> --
> ***************** Seek GOD! *************
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 07:04:15 -0400
> From: Omololu Akin-Ojo <prayerz.omo at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] pw.x seg. faults with EXX
> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CAEXTJ7TOx+M5rB39jH3HhcV+-Mgu6EdkY4+QGE01zJCk_4yr3w at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Ciao ancora Tutti,
>
> It seems I diagnosed the problem: with the pbe0 hybrid, it seems you
> cannot set ecutrho to more than 4 times ecutwfc. I don't know why. The
> default seems to be ecutrho = 4 X ecutwfc so I just removed my
> specification for ecutrho and it runs without segfault. So far it is
> still running.
>
> Grazie.
>
> o.
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Omololu Akin-Ojo <prayerz.omo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Ciao Tutti,
> >
> > I am trying to do a calculation with the PBE0 functional. I compiled
> > pw.x using -DEXX. However, I got the following message when I tried to
> > run. (If I replace input_dft='pbe0' with input_dft='pbe', I don't have
> > this error but this is obviously not what I want.
> > Thanks in advance for any help.
> >
> > ? ? XC functional enforced from input :
> > ? ? Exchange-correlation ? ? ?= PBE0 (6484)
> > ? ? EXX-fraction ? ? ? ? ? ? ?= ? ? ? ?0.25
> > ? ? !!! Any further DFT definition will be discarded
> > ? ? !!! Please, verify this is what you really want !
> >
> > ? ? file O.pbe-mt.UPF: wavefunction(s) ?0S 0P 0D renormalized
> >
> > ? ? Subspace diagonalization in iterative solution of the eigenvalue
> problem:
> > ? ? a serial algorithm will be used
> >
> > [compute-1-7:09041] *** Process received signal ***
> > [compute-1-7:09041] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> > [compute-1-7:09041] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> > [compute-1-7:09041] Failing at address: 0x5
> >
> >
> > o.
> >
> > Postdoctoral Fellow,
> > ICTP, Trieste, ITALY
> >
> > --
> > ***************** Seek GOD! *************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ***************** Seek GOD! *************
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
> End of Pw_forum Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110804/345aefbd/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list