[Pw_forum] More ncpp2upf and fhi2upf

Paolo Giannozzi giannozz at democritos.it
Wed Aug 19 22:14:53 CEST 2009


On Wednesday 19 August 2009 20:28, Nicole Benedek wrote:

> [...] ncpp2upf seems to be broken if you have augmentation operators

I beg your pardon: "augmentation operators" in norm conserving
pseudopotentials? and how can a converter from an obsolete format 
be broken? it hasn't changed since a long time

paolo
-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and Udine University



More information about the users mailing list