[Pw_forum] complex band calculation

ambavale sagar sagarambavale at yahoo.co.in
Fri Mar 7 07:14:37 CET 2008


Dear Alexander and Andrea sir,
Thank you very much to both of you.
i changed respective variables but it still stops at same point. so now it is problem with my pc only which have just 512 MB RAM.
still one more doubt is there. that is running example 03 of espresso 3.2.3 doesnt give complete output with all force calculations. it stops there also in a midway.  giannozi sir told it is not the problem related to less memory as that example 03 requires very less memory. i m sending output of example 03--- al001.rx.out one more time. 

=======================================================================================================
 Program PWSCF     v.3.2.3  starts ...
     Today is  1Mar2008 at 10:35:46 

     Ultrasoft (Vanderbilt) Pseudopotentials

     Current dimensions of program pwscf are:

     ntypx = 10   npk = 40000  lmax =  3
     nchix =  6  ndmx =  2000  nbrx = 14  nqfx =  8


     bravais-lattice index     =            6
     lattice parameter (a_0)   =       5.3033  a.u.
     unit-cell volume          =    1193.2421 (a.u.)^3
     number of atoms/cell      =            7
     number of atomic types    =            1
     kinetic-energy cutoff     =      12.0000  Ry
     charge density cutoff     =      48.0000  Ry
     convergence threshold     =      1.0E-06
     beta                      =       0.3000
     number of iterations used =            8  plain     mixing
     Exchange-correlation      =  SLA  PZ   NOGX NOGC (1100)
     nstep                     =           50

     celldm(1)=   5.303300  celldm(2)=   0.000000  celldm(3)=   8.000000
     celldm(4)=   0.000000  celldm(5)=   0.000000  celldm(6)=   0.000000

     crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a_0)
               a(1) = (  1.000000  0.000000  0.000000 )  
               a(2) = (  0.000000  1.000000  0.000000 )  
               a(3) = (  0.000000  0.000000  8.000000 )  

     reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in units 2 pi/a_0)
               b(1) = (  1.000000  0.000000  0.000000 )  
               b(2) = (  0.000000  1.000000  0.000000 )  
               b(3) = (  0.000000  0.000000  0.125000 )  


     PSEUDO 1 is Al         zval =  3.0   lmax= 1   lloc= 0
     (in numerical form:   171 grid points, xmin =  0.00, dx = 0.0000)

     atomic species   valence    mass     pseudopotential
        Al             3.00     1.00000     Al( 1.00)

     16 Sym.Ops. (with inversion)


   Cartesian axes

     site n.     atom                  positions (a_0 units)
         1           Al  tau(  1) = (   0.5000000   0.5000000  -2.1213200  )
         2           Al  tau(  2) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000  -1.4142130  )
         3           Al  tau(  3) = (   0.5000000   0.5000000  -0.7071070  )
         4           Al  tau(  4) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000   0.0000000  )
         5           Al  tau(  5) = (   0.5000000   0.5000000   0.7071070  )
         6           Al  tau(  6) = (   0.0000000   0.0000000   1.4142130  )
         7           Al  tau(  7) = (   0.5000000   0.5000000   2.1213200  )

     number of k points=    3  gaussian broad. (Ry)=  0.0500     ngauss =   1
                       cart. coord. in units 2pi/a_0
        k(    1) = (   0.1250000   0.1250000   0.0000000), wk =   0.5000000
        k(    2) = (   0.1250000   0.3750000   0.0000000), wk =   1.0000000
        k(    3) = (   0.3750000   0.3750000   0.0000000), wk =   0.5000000

     G cutoff =   34.1959  (   6689 G-vectors)     FFT grid: ( 12, 12, 96)

     nbndx  =    60  nbnd   =    15  natomwfc =    63  npwx   =     860
     nelec  =  21.00  nkb   =    28  ngl    =     351

     Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
     Check: negative starting charge=   -0.000275

     starting charge   20.98560, renormalised to   21.00000

     negative rho (up, down):  0.276E-03 0.000E+00
     Starting wfc are atomic

     total cpu time spent up to now is      0.93 secs

     Self-consistent Calculation

     iteration #  1     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  1.00E-02,  avg # of iterations =  2.0

     negative rho (up, down):  0.186E-03 0.000E+00

     total cpu time spent up to now is      1.42 secs

     total energy              =   -28.81800044 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.29242665 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.99707290 Ry

     iteration #  2     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  4.75E-03,  avg # of iterations =  4.3

     total cpu time spent up to now is      2.22 secs

     total energy              =   -27.55975725 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -30.64244044 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <    42.47180210 Ry

     iteration #  3     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  4.75E-03,  avg # of iterations =  3.7

     total cpu time spent up to now is      2.95 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21236680 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.23827251 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.25038981 Ry

     iteration #  4     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  1.19E-03,  avg # of iterations =  2.3

     total cpu time spent up to now is      3.44 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21649581 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.22410750 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.04585932 Ry

     iteration #  5     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  2.18E-04,  avg # of iterations =  2.7

     total cpu time spent up to now is      3.91 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21973500 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.22006263 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00336979 Ry

     iteration #  6     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  1.60E-05,  avg # of iterations =  4.7

     total cpu time spent up to now is      4.53 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21993710 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.21994846 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00071042 Ry

     iteration #  7     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  3.38E-06,  avg # of iterations =  3.0

     total cpu time spent up to now is      5.01 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21995305 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.21996870 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00004258 Ry

     iteration #  8     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  2.03E-07,  avg # of iterations =  2.7

     total cpu time spent up to now is      5.56 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21995565 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.21996337 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00004475 Ry

     iteration #  9     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  2.03E-07,  avg # of iterations =  2.3

     total cpu time spent up to now is      6.03 secs

     total energy              =   -29.21995946 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.21996144 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00000791 Ry

     iteration # 10     ecut=    12.00 Ry     beta=0.30
     Davidson diagonalization with overlap
     ethr =  3.77E-08,  avg # of iterations =  1.7

     total cpu time spent up to now is      6.48 secs

     End of self-consistent calculation

          k = 0.1250 0.1250 0.0000 (   822 PWs)   bands (ev):

    -7.0790  -6.5548  -5.7171  -4.5664  -3.1473  -1.4539   0.5128   1.7883
     4.3696   5.5244   5.9957   6.2180   6.7549   7.2249   7.4957

          k = 0.1250 0.3750 0.0000 (   847 PWs)   bands (ev):

    -4.7555  -4.2388  -3.4158  -2.2857  -0.8948  -0.2551   0.2241   0.8003
     1.0426   2.1352   2.7199   3.5255   3.8932   5.1676   6.5171

          k = 0.3750 0.3750 0.0000 (   860 PWs)   bands (ev):

    -2.4879  -1.9828  -1.1748  -0.0657   1.2960   1.3317   1.7996   2.5507
     2.7201   2.8085   3.4483   3.5987   4.1264   4.9118   4.9355

     the Fermi energy is     3.4731 ev

!    total energy              =   -29.21996018 Ry
     Harris-Foulkes estimate   =   -29.21996051 Ry
     estimated scf accuracy    <     0.00000043 Ry

     The total energy is the sum of the following terms:

     one-electron contribution =  -182.00588641 Ry
     hartree contribution      =    97.74163219 Ry
     xc contribution           =   -11.20672435 Ry
     ewald contribution        =    66.25386160 Ry
     smearing contrib. (-TS)   =    -0.00284321 Ry

     convergence has been achieved

     Forces acting on atoms (Ry/au):

     atom   1 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000    0.01010485
     atom   2 type  1   force =     0.00000000    0.00000000   -0.00112292
     atom   3 type  1



======================================================================================================
thus it does not calculate all components.
 i am us








      5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Go to http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080307/497e1700/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list