[Pw_forum] how to get U in DFT+Hubbard U
matteo at umn.edu
Thu Oct 18 00:50:45 CEST 2007
I will try to answer to your questions.
the fact that the electron never localized is not due to a "real"
electronic coupling between the two Fe (which are important at short
distances of course), but mostly to self-interaction.
Yes, you should use two different U ideally self-consistently computed
with the water molecules relaxed in the configuration with the electron
localized on the 2+ Fe. However it may turn out difficult to get this
result with LDA+U only because LDA+U is not designed to cure
self-interaction problems. You may need Us as large as 10 eV to get that
It could be useful for you to read this paper:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 028303 (2006)
Hope this will help.
Agostino Migliore wrote:
> I am working on electron transfer in a solvated Fe2+/Fe3+ system. The
> electron is (or "should be") always (i.e. for each water configuration)
> essentially localized on one site, but a small portion (increasing near
> the transition state) must be on the other site, just because of a nonzero
> (although small) electronic coupling between the two sites. So, I wonder
> and ask
> if I should use two different U numbers for the two ions (e.g., that
> obtained for the isolated oxidized (3+) site and the one for the reduced
> site (2+), after check, without U, about the site that should turn out to
> be essentially reduced/oxidized) or if I should use an average U for both
> (neglecting the differences due to different water arrangements) and
> "leave the transferring electron to reach its state", without biasing its
> localization through different U's.
> Agostino Migliore
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 294 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the users