[Pw_forum] About ecutwfc and ecutrho again

Stefano Baroni baroni at sissa.it
Fri Dec 21 08:03:36 CET 2007


the largest - as a home assignment, please take half an hour to think  
about this and provide us with an explanation. SB

On Dec 21, 2007, at 4:39 AM, Huiqun Zhou wrote:

> Dear PWscfers,
>
> I'm creating and testing pseudopotentials for severval
> elements myself. I plotted the E-ecutwfc graphs for
> each element, in which the ecutwfc was ranging from 20
> to 60 with increament of 5 Ry and ecutrho was set to 600.
> If take 1 mRy as convergence criterion, I find that the
> total energy for some elements will be convergent at
> ecutwfc = 35 Ry while some are around ecutwfc = 55 Ry.
>
> If the material I'm interested in is comprised from elements
> with both lower and higher ecutwfc, what ecutwfc should I
> set for the material, the higher one, the higher one plus
> alpha, or a compromise between the lower and higher?
>
> Thnaks!
>
>
> Dr. Huiqun Zhou
> @Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, China
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA  &  DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center -  
Trieste
[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni (skype)

Please, if possible, don't  send me MS Word or PowerPoint attachments
Why? See:  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071221/96b05c36/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list