[Pw_forum] Error 254

Roberto G. A. Veiga raveiga at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 31 15:52:14 CET 2004


The last input I tried to run:
 

 &CONTROL
                       title = 'SiC nanotubo' ,
                 calculation = 'relax' ,
                restart_mode = 'restart' ,
                      outdir = '/home2/rveiga/pwscf/SiC_tubo_10x0/temp' ,
                  pseudo_dir = '/home2/rveiga/pwscf/pseudo' ,
                      prefix = 'SiC_tubo_' ,
                     tstress = .true. ,
                     tprnfor = .true. ,
                     tefield = .false. ,
 /
 &SYSTEM
                       ibrav = 0 ,
                   celldm(1) = 16 ,
                         nat = 40 ,
                        ntyp = 2 ,
                     ecutwfc = 200 ,
                     ecutrho = 800 ,
 /
 &ELECTRONS
             diagonalization = 'cg' ,
            diago_cg_maxiter = 100,
 /
 &ions
                ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
 /
CELL_PARAMETERS cubic 
     1.000000000    0.000000000    0.000000000 
     0.000000000    1.000000000    0.000000000 
     0.000000000    0.000000000    0.337640000 
ATOMIC_SPECIES
    C   12.01070  C.pbe.UPF 
   Si   28.08550  Si.pbe.UPF 
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom 
      Si    -4.190747588    -3.044757516    11.162718476
      C    -2.795729044    -3.847992579    12.060852994
      Si    -1.600722647    -4.926521055    11.162717842
      C     0.000001268    -4.756383534    12.060853150
      Si     1.600725007    -4.926521596    11.162718770
      C     2.795731476    -3.847993422    12.060853167
      Si     4.190748942    -3.044756226    11.162717803
      C     4.523587436    -1.469801550    12.060853190
      Si     5.180051253     0.000000694    11.162718733
      C     4.523589745     1.469803935    12.060853216
      Si     4.190749659     3.044758363    11.162717988
      C     2.795730851     3.847993473    12.060853044
      Si     1.600723695     4.926520842    11.162718594
      C     0.000000041     4.756382431    12.060853090
      Si    -1.600723820     4.926520895    11.162717958
      C    -2.795730519     3.847992685    12.060852971
      Si    -4.190748360     3.044756410    11.162718456
      C    -4.523587922     1.469802077    12.060852941
      Si    -5.180051403    -0.000000600    11.162717996
      C    -4.523588465    -1.469803510    12.060853026
      Si    -0.000002654    -5.177544927    13.865293482
      C     1.469510317    -4.522685823    14.765401504
      Si     3.043287487    -4.188717876    13.865293497
      C     3.847150315    -2.795117525    14.765402457
      Si     4.924134839    -1.599951492    13.865293530
      C     4.755432380     0.000001215    14.765401635
      Si     4.924136880     1.599953559    13.865293554
      C     3.847153015     2.795120144    14.765402158
      Si     3.043286323     4.188718335    13.865293276
      C     1.469508211     4.522682339    14.765401280
      Si    -0.000003631     5.177544012    13.865293341
      C    -1.469481642     4.522600037    14.765402001
      Si    -3.043280413     4.188721722    13.865293159
      C    -3.847221793     2.795169566    14.765401062
      Si    -4.924137438     1.599944917    13.865293132
      C    -4.755344224    -0.000000802    14.765401847
      Si    -4.924137902    -1.599946427    13.865293269
      C    -3.847222292    -2.795170930    14.765401286
      Si    -3.043278787    -4.188721885    13.865293237
      C    -1.469479562    -4.522598407    14.765402183
K_POINTS automatic 
  1 1 1   0 0 0 
 

 
[]s,
 
Roberto

Axel Kohlmeyer <axel.kohlmeyer at theochem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Roberto G. A. Veiga wrote:

roberto,

it means that some eigenvalue calculation during 
a diagonalization failed. pwscf checks the error
status for calls to LAPACK and the error number
is the value of the INFO variable. to find out
more details, you have to search the source code
for 'CALL errore(...) ' statements. 

but of course this does not explain the 'real' 
problem. for that, however, you need to post your 
input file. there are many subtle (and some not so
subtle) ways to screw up an input. in some cases
it can also be important to know on what platform
you are running and what compiler/libraries you 
have used.

the espresso distribution comes with a large number
of instructive examples. perhaps you should have a
look at some of them and compare them to your system.
it is also a good idea to run some of them to verify,
that your executables work correctly.

best regards,
axel.


RV> Initial potential from superposition of free atoms
RV> Starting wfc are atomic
RV> 2
RV> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
RV> from cdiaghg : error # 254
RV> info =/= 0
RV> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
RV> stopping ...
RV> 
RV> 
RV> What does it mean?
RV> 
RV> []s,
RV> 
RV> Roberto
RV> 
RV> 
RV> ---------------------------------
RV> Do you Yahoo!?
RV> The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do?

-- 

=======================================================================
Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer e-mail: axel.kohlmeyer at theochem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Lehrstuhl fuer Theoretische Chemie Phone: ++49 (0)234/32-26673
Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum - NC 03/53 Fax: ++49 (0)234/32-14045
D-44780 Bochum http://www.theochem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~axel.kohlmeyer/
=======================================================================
If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum



---------------------------------

Blogs: http://robertoveiga.blogspot.com e http://democracialiberal.blogspot.com.



		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20041231/fd970b55/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list